Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 22nd November 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Teacake error costs taxman £3.5 million - victory for Marks and Spencer



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 10 April 2008
The humble chocolate teacake cost the Treasury £3.5 million today.

That's the price of a VAT mistake which classified Marks & Spencer teacakes as chocolate biscuits.

Twenty years later HM Customs and Excise acknowledged the error and said teacakes are chocolate cakes after all - a crucial distinction because chocolate biscuits are subject to standard-rate VAT and chocolate cakes are zero-rated.

But by the time the error was corrected Marks & Spencer had handed over £3.5m in wrongly paid VAT on its teacake sales, and demanded the money back.

Today the European Court of Justice agreed that a teacake is not a biscuit and confirmed that the Treasury should reimburse the retailer.

The 12-year legal battle began when the Commissioners of Customs and Excise acknowledged the error - but only offered £350,000 back on the grounds that 90% of the VAT had been passed on to Marks & Spencer customers: paying back the total sum would therefore mean "unjust enrichment" for the store.




The full article contains 176 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 10 April 2008 4:23 PM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Halifax
 
Prev
1
Next
1

Peter Avinou,

Elland 10/04/2008 17:23:35
Bet if it had been me I wouldn't have got back!
2

Barney Rubble,

Having a VAT Free Chocolate Teacake 10/04/2008 17:48:55
How can 90% have been refunded to the customers? How can they possibly have found them to repay them?
3

Peter Avinou,

Elland 11/04/2008 08:01:27
Now then, you have to forgive corporate publicity misinformation, their in it for the money. I don't think they've given it back either. Who registers a Chocolate Teacake sale on a 20 year recording basis?
Porkies!
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.